PlainHospital

Tool · Side-by-side comparison

Compare Hospitals

Put any two of 5,426 Medicare-certified hospitals head to head on CMS star ratings, patient experience, infections, readmissions, spending, and maternal care.

5,426
Hospitals
3.1★
National avg
2,866
Rated

Every figure here is drawn from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare release covering 5,426 Medicare-certified hospitals, last refreshed March 2026 — see our methodology.

University of Michigan Health System

Ann Arbor, MI

Acute Care Hospitals

Ascension Borgess Allegan Hospital

Allegan, MI

Critical Access Hospitals

Overview

Metric University of Michigan Health System Ascension Borgess Allegan Hospital
Overall Star Rating 4/5 ★ N/A
Type Acute Care Hospitals Critical Access Hospitals
Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private Voluntary non-profit - Private
Emergency Services Yes Yes
Birthing Friendly Yes No
Avg Patient Experience 3.7 N/A

Quality Performance

Number of quality measures rated better, same, or worse than the national average

Category University of Michigan Health System Ascension Borgess Allegan Hospital
Better Same Worse Better Same Worse
Mortality 2 5 0 0 1 0
Safety of Care 4 4 0 N/A N/A N/A
Readmission 1 9 1 0 3 0

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Patient satisfaction survey star ratings (1-5 scale)

Survey Question University of Michigan Health System Ascension Borgess Allegan Hospital
Cleanliness - linear mean score N/A N/A
Cleanliness - star rating ★ 2 N/A
Communication about medicines - linear mean score N/A N/A
Communication about medicines - star rating ★ 3 N/A
Discharge information - linear mean score N/A N/A
Discharge information - star rating ★ 4 N/A
Doctor communication - linear mean score N/A N/A
Doctor communication - star rating ★ 4 N/A
Nurse communication - linear mean score N/A N/A
Nurse communication - star rating ★ 5 N/A
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score N/A N/A
Overall hospital rating - star rating ★ 4 N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) N/A N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) N/A N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) N/A N/A
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital N/A N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge N/A N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge N/A N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home N/A N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them N/A N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them N/A N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them N/A N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night N/A N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night N/A N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean N/A N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for N/A N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects N/A N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for N/A N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects N/A N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. N/A N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects N/A N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge N/A N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge N/A N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home N/A N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital N/A N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital N/A N/A
Quietness - linear mean score N/A N/A
Quietness - star rating ★ 2 N/A
Recommend hospital - linear mean score N/A N/A
Recommend hospital - star rating ★ 5 N/A
Summary star rating ★ 4 N/A

Healthcare-Associated Infections

Infection rates compared to national benchmarks

Infection Type University of Michigan Health System Ascension Borgess Allegan Hospital
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)
0.791
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit
0.573
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days
33316
Same as National
71
Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases
40
Same as National
0
Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases
50.558
Same as National
0.047
Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit
1.067
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)
0.608
Better than National
N/A
Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit
0.456
Better than National
N/A
Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases
50
Better than National
0
Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases
82.284
Better than National
0.016
Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit
0.795
Better than National
N/A
Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days
73032
Better than National
59
Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)
0.481
Better than National
N/A
Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit
0.384
Better than National
N/A
Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases
80
Better than National
0
Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days
301296
Better than National
680
Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases
166.258
Better than National
0.15
Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit
0.596
Better than National
N/A
Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia
0.456
Better than National
N/A
Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit
0.247
Better than National
N/A
Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases
12
Better than National
0
Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days
329712
Better than National
680
Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases
26.339
Better than National
0.014
Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit
0.775
Better than National
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy
0.678
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit
0.114
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures
305
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases
2
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases
2.951
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit
2.239
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery
0.71
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit
0.395
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures
635
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases
13
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases
18.305
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit
1.184
Same as National
N/A
Not Available

Medicare Spending

Medicare spending per episode compared between hospitals

Measure University of Michigan Health System Ascension Borgess Allegan Hospital
Medicare hospital spending per patient (Medicare Spending per Beneficiary) 0.91 N/A

Maternal Health

Maternal care quality measures including C-section rates and outcomes

Measure University of Michigan Health System Ascension Borgess Allegan Hospital
Cesarean Birth N/A N/A
Maternal Morbidity Structural Measure N/A N/A
Risk Adjusted Severe Obstetric Complications (All) N/A N/A
Risk Adjusted Severe Obstetric Complications (excluding blood-transfusion-only cases) N/A N/A

Data from CMS Hospital Compare. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Learn more

Frequently Asked Questions

What data is used in this hospital comparison?

This comparison tool uses data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare program. It includes overall star ratings, quality measures (mortality, safety, readmissions), patient experience (HCAHPS) surveys, healthcare-associated infection rates, unplanned visit measures, Medicare spending per episode, and maternal health measures.

How are CMS star ratings calculated?

CMS overall hospital star ratings are calculated on a scale of 1 to 5 stars using data from multiple quality measures across five categories: mortality, safety of care, readmission, patient experience, and timely and effective care. Hospitals must have sufficient data in at least three measure groups to receive a star rating.

What does "Better than National" mean?

When a quality measure is marked "Better than National," it means the hospital's performance on that specific measure is statistically significantly better than the national benchmark. Similarly, "Worse than National" indicates the hospital performs significantly below the benchmark, and "Same as National" means no statistically significant difference.

What are HCAHPS patient experience surveys?

HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) is a standardized patient satisfaction survey administered to a random sample of recently discharged patients. It measures aspects of hospital care such as communication with doctors and nurses, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, discharge information, and overall rating.

How often is the comparison data updated?

CMS publishes updated Hospital Compare data quarterly. Our database is refreshed with each new CMS release to provide the most current quality metrics available for comparison.

Can I compare more than two hospitals?

Currently this tool supports side-by-side comparison of two hospitals at a time. For broader comparisons, check our Rankings pages for top-rated, safest, and best patient experience hospitals.