PlainHospital

Compare Hospitals

Search and select two hospitals to compare their CMS quality data side by side.

ALASKA NATIVE MEDICAL CENTER

ANCHORAGE, AK

Acute Care Hospitals

673rd Medical Group (Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson)

JBER, AK

Acute Care - Department of Defense

Overview

Metric ALASKA NATIVE MEDICAL CENTER 673rd Medical Group (Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson)
Overall Star Rating 3/5 ★ N/A
Type Acute Care Hospitals Acute Care - Department of Defense
Ownership Government - Federal Department of Defense
Emergency Services Yes Yes
Birthing Friendly Yes No
Avg Patient Experience 2.9 4.0

Quality Performance

Number of quality measures rated better, same, or worse than the national average

Category ALASKA NATIVE MEDICAL CENTER 673rd Medical Group (Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson)
Better Same Worse Better Same Worse
Mortality 0 6 0 N/A N/A N/A
Safety of Care 1 5 1 N/A N/A N/A
Readmission 0 7 0 N/A N/A N/A

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Patient satisfaction survey star ratings (1-5 scale)

Survey Question ALASKA NATIVE MEDICAL CENTER 673rd Medical Group (Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson)
Cleanliness - linear mean score N/A N/A
Cleanliness - star rating ★ 3 ★ 2
Communication about medicines - linear mean score N/A N/A
Communication about medicines - star rating ★ 4 ★ 4
Discharge information - linear mean score N/A N/A
Discharge information - star rating ★ 3 ★ 4
Doctor communication - linear mean score N/A N/A
Doctor communication - star rating ★ 2 ★ 4
Nurse communication - linear mean score N/A N/A
Nurse communication - star rating ★ 3 ★ 5
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score N/A N/A
Overall hospital rating - star rating ★ 3 ★ 4
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) N/A N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) N/A N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) N/A N/A
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital N/A N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge N/A N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge N/A N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home N/A N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them N/A N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them N/A N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them N/A N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night N/A N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night N/A N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean N/A N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean N/A N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for N/A N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects N/A N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for N/A N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects N/A N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. N/A N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects N/A N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge N/A N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge N/A N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home N/A N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital N/A N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital N/A N/A
Quietness - linear mean score N/A N/A
Quietness - star rating ★ 2 ★ 4
Recommend hospital - linear mean score N/A N/A
Recommend hospital - star rating ★ 3 ★ 5
Summary star rating ★ 3 ★ 4

Healthcare-Associated Infections

Infection rates compared to national benchmarks

Infection Type ALASKA NATIVE MEDICAL CENTER 673rd Medical Group (Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson)
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)
0.519
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit
0.132
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days
5734
Same as National
493
Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases
3
Same as National
0
Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases
5.778
Same as National
0.251
Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit
1.413
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)
1.453
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit
0.709
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases
9
Same as National
0
Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases
6.194
Same as National
0.251
Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit
2.666
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days
6955
Same as National
360
Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)
0.267
Better than National
N/A
Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit
0.085
Better than National
N/A
Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases
4
Better than National
0
Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days
41793
Better than National
3292
Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases
14.955
Better than National
0.855
Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit
0.645
Better than National
N/A
Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia
2.126
Worse than National
N/A
Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit
1.08
Worse than National
N/A
Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases
10
Worse than National
N/A
Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days
55297
Worse than National
N/A
Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases
4.703
Worse than National
N/A
Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit
3.79
Worse than National
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy
N/A
Not Available
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit
N/A
Not Available
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures
39
Not Available
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases
0
Not Available
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases
0.349
Not Available
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit
N/A
Not Available
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery
1.555
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit
0.63
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures
137
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases
6
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases
3.859
Same as National
N/A
Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit
3.234
Same as National
N/A
Not Available

Medicare Spending

Medicare spending per episode compared between hospitals

Measure ALASKA NATIVE MEDICAL CENTER 673rd Medical Group (Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson)
Medicare hospital spending per patient (Medicare Spending per Beneficiary) 0.88 N/A

Maternal Health

Maternal care quality measures including C-section rates and outcomes

Measure ALASKA NATIVE MEDICAL CENTER 673rd Medical Group (Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson)
Cesarean Birth N/A N/A
Maternal Morbidity Structural Measure N/A N/A
Risk Adjusted Severe Obstetric Complications (All) N/A N/A
Risk Adjusted Severe Obstetric Complications (excluding blood-transfusion-only cases) N/A N/A

Data from CMS Hospital Compare. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Learn more

Frequently Asked Questions

What data is used in this hospital comparison?

This comparison tool uses data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare program. It includes overall star ratings, quality measures (mortality, safety, readmissions), patient experience (HCAHPS) surveys, healthcare-associated infection rates, unplanned visit measures, Medicare spending per episode, and maternal health measures.

How are CMS star ratings calculated?

CMS overall hospital star ratings are calculated on a scale of 1 to 5 stars using data from multiple quality measures across five categories: mortality, safety of care, readmission, patient experience, and timely and effective care. Hospitals must have sufficient data in at least three measure groups to receive a star rating.

What does "Better than National" mean?

When a quality measure is marked "Better than National," it means the hospital's performance on that specific measure is statistically significantly better than the national benchmark. Similarly, "Worse than National" indicates the hospital performs significantly below the benchmark, and "Same as National" means no statistically significant difference.

What are HCAHPS patient experience surveys?

HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) is a standardized patient satisfaction survey administered to a random sample of recently discharged patients. It measures aspects of hospital care such as communication with doctors and nurses, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, discharge information, and overall rating.

How often is the comparison data updated?

CMS publishes updated Hospital Compare data quarterly. Our database is refreshed with each new CMS release to provide the most current quality metrics available for comparison.

Can I compare more than two hospitals?

Currently this tool supports side-by-side comparison of two hospitals at a time. For broader comparisons, check our Rankings pages for top-rated, safest, and best patient experience hospitals.