2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Endoscopic Grasping/Cutting Instrument, Non-Powered

Open-data reference.

FDA MAUDE adverse event data · 2004–2026

What the Data Shows About Endoscopic Grasping/Cutting Instrument, Non-Powered

The FDA MAUDE database aggregates 2,195 adverse-event reports for Endoscopic Grasping/Cutting Instrument, Non-Powered spanning the period from 2004 through 2026. Of these, 1 is classified as a death report, 76 as injury reports, and 2,114 as malfunction reports under FDA adverse-event categorization rules. Report counts do not by themselves indicate a device is unsafe — widely used devices and longer market histories naturally generate larger raw counts, so proportional and comparative reads are more informative than totals alone.

The adverse-event profile breaks down across 5 distinct event types and 10 reported patient-outcome categories, giving a multi-dimensional view that goes beyond a single headline number. A total of 20 distinct product-problem codes appear in the reports, with Device Operates Differently Than Expected topping the list at 577 reports. Reports are associated with 10 different manufacturers in the MAUDE record, reflecting both OEMs and repackagers of this device category.

Annual reporting volume is tracked across 21 years of MAUDE data, with the peak single-year volume reaching 759 reports — trend shape often reflects changes in device adoption, reporting rules, or FDA enforcement focus rather than underlying device behavior alone. Events are documented across 5 reported care-setting categories (hospital, home, ambulatory surgery center, etc.). All figures reflect the openFDA MAUDE snapshot last refreshed on . This page is informational and is not medical advice — discuss device-safety questions with your healthcare provider.

2,195
Total Reports
1
Death Reports
76
Injury Reports
2,114
Malfunctions

Event Types

Malfunction 2,114 (96.3%)
Injury 76 (3.5%)
Other 3 (0.1%)
1 (0.0%)
Death 1 (0.0%)

Patient Outcomes

2,100 (94.8%)
Other 58 (2.6%)
Required Intervention 29 (1.3%)
O 9 (0.4%)
R 7 (0.3%)
Hospitalization 6 (0.3%)
H 3 (0.1%)
L 1 (0.0%)
Death 1 (0.0%)
Disability 1 (0.0%)

Top Product Problems

Device Operates Differently Than Expected 577
Device Packaging Compromised 528
Break 514
Crack 135
Material Integrity Problem 65
Peeled/Delaminated 59
Difficult to Open or Close 26
Detachment of Device or Device Component 24
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem 16
Material Fragmentation 14
Material Separation 14
Mechanical Problem 9
Physical Property Issue 9
Arcing 8
Insufficient Information 8
Component Missing 6
Difficult to Remove 6
Mechanics Altered 6
Device Inoperable 5
Mechanical Jam 5

Yearly Trend

04
2004: 2
06
2006: 1
07
2007: 1
08
2008: 2
09
2009: 2
10
2010: 2
12
2012: 6
13
2013: 4
14
2014: 1
15
2015: 242
16
2016: 759
17
2017: 734
18
2018: 252
19
2019: 15
20
2020: 21
21
2021: 20
22
2022: 33
23
2023: 25
24
2024: 37
25
2025: 34
26
2026: 2

Related Entities for Endoscopic Grasping/Cutting Instrument, Non-Powered

Event Locations

I 2,018 (91.9%)
136 (6.2%)
HOSPITAL 33 (1.5%)
NO INFORMATION 7 (0.3%)
OUTPATIENT TREATMENT FACILITY 1 (0.0%)

Compare STRYKER ENDOSCOPY-SAN JOSE vs KARL STORZ SE & CO. KG →

Data Source

FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database via the openFDA API. Reports are submitted by manufacturers, healthcare facilities, and patients. Report counts do not indicate a device is unsafe — higher-use devices naturally generate more reports.

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the FDA MAUDE database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.