2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Processor, Cervical Cytology Slide, Automated

Open-data reference.

FDA MAUDE adverse event data · 1996–2026

What the Data Shows About Processor, Cervical Cytology Slide, Automated

The FDA MAUDE database aggregates 400 adverse-event reports for Processor, Cervical Cytology Slide, Automated spanning the period from 1996 through 2026. Of these, 0 are classified as death reports, 40 as injury reports, and 232 as malfunction reports under FDA adverse-event categorization rules. Report counts do not by themselves indicate a device is unsafe — widely used devices and longer market histories naturally generate larger raw counts, so proportional and comparative reads are more informative than totals alone.

The adverse-event profile breaks down across 4 distinct event types and 6 reported patient-outcome categories, giving a multi-dimensional view that goes beyond a single headline number. A total of 20 distinct product-problem codes appear in the reports, with Leak/Splash topping the list at 71 reports. Reports are associated with 10 different manufacturers in the MAUDE record, reflecting both OEMs and repackagers of this device category.

Annual reporting volume is tracked across 29 years of MAUDE data, with the peak single-year volume reaching 77 reports — trend shape often reflects changes in device adoption, reporting rules, or FDA enforcement focus rather than underlying device behavior alone. Events are documented across 7 reported care-setting categories (hospital, home, ambulatory surgery center, etc.). All figures reflect the openFDA MAUDE snapshot last refreshed on . This page is informational and is not medical advice — discuss device-safety questions with your healthcare provider.

400
Total Reports
0
Death Reports
40
Injury Reports
232
Malfunctions

Event Types

Malfunction 232 (58.0%)
Other 74 (18.5%)
54 (13.5%)
Injury 40 (10.0%)

Patient Outcomes

234 (56.8%)
Other 146 (35.4%)
R 12 (2.9%)
Required Intervention 11 (2.7%)
Hospitalization 8 (1.9%)
Life Threatening 1 (0.2%)

Top Product Problems

Leak/Splash 71
Contamination 43
Device Markings/Labelling Problem 27
Structural Problem 21
Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings 15
Break 14
Device Operates Differently Than Expected 13
False Negative Result 11
Device Displays Incorrect Message 10
Computer Operating System Problem 6
Crack 5
Patient Data Problem 4
Data Problem 3
Display Difficult to Read 3
Improper Device Output 3
Microbial Contamination of Device 3
Application Program Problem 2
Complete Blockage 2
Contamination of Device Ingredient or Reagent 2
Device Alarm System 2

Yearly Trend

96
1996: 1
97
1997: 1
98
1998: 1
99
1999: 5
00
2000: 4
01
2001: 3
03
2003: 6
04
2004: 6
05
2005: 9
06
2006: 4
07
2007: 7
08
2008: 8
09
2009: 6
10
2010: 18
11
2011: 19
12
2012: 6
13
2013: 6
14
2014: 16
15
2015: 22
16
2016: 28
17
2017: 6
18
2018: 2
20
2020: 1
21
2021: 24
22
2022: 17
23
2023: 77
24
2024: 56
25
2025: 38
26
2026: 3

Related Entities for Processor, Cervical Cytology Slide, Automated

Event Locations

330 (82.5%)
I 62 (15.5%)
HOSPITAL 3 (0.8%)
NO INFORMATION 2 (0.5%)
OTHER 1 (0.3%)
OUTPATIENT DIAGNOSTIC FACILITY 1 (0.3%)
OUTPATIENT TREATMENT FACILITY 1 (0.3%)

Compare TRIPATH IMAGING, INC vs BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) →

Data Source

FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database via the openFDA API. Reports are submitted by manufacturers, healthcare facilities, and patients. Report counts do not indicate a device is unsafe — higher-use devices naturally generate more reports.

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the FDA MAUDE database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.