2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Pulmonic Valved Conduit

Open-data reference.

FDA MAUDE adverse event data · 2002–2026

What the Data Shows About Pulmonic Valved Conduit

The FDA MAUDE database aggregates 1,107 adverse-event reports for Pulmonic Valved Conduit spanning the period from 2002 through 2026. Of these, 48 are classified as death reports, 1,034 as injury reports, and 24 as malfunction reports under FDA adverse-event categorization rules. Report counts do not by themselves indicate a device is unsafe — widely used devices and longer market histories naturally generate larger raw counts, so proportional and comparative reads are more informative than totals alone.

The adverse-event profile breaks down across 4 distinct event types and 13 reported patient-outcome categories, giving a multi-dimensional view that goes beyond a single headline number. A total of 20 distinct product-problem codes appear in the reports, with Insufficient Information topping the list at 494 reports. Reports are associated with 10 different manufacturers in the MAUDE record, reflecting both OEMs and repackagers of this device category.

Annual reporting volume is tracked across 25 years of MAUDE data, with the peak single-year volume reaching 128 reports — trend shape often reflects changes in device adoption, reporting rules, or FDA enforcement focus rather than underlying device behavior alone. Events are documented across 5 reported care-setting categories (hospital, home, ambulatory surgery center, etc.). All figures reflect the openFDA MAUDE snapshot last refreshed on . This page is informational and is not medical advice — discuss device-safety questions with your healthcare provider.

1,107
Total Reports
48
Death Reports
1,034
Injury Reports
24
Malfunctions

Event Types

Injury 1,034 (93.4%)
Death 48 (4.3%)
Malfunction 24 (2.2%)
1 (0.1%)

Patient Outcomes

Required Intervention 793 (51.4%)
R 245 (15.9%)
Hospitalization 190 (12.3%)
H 136 (8.8%)
L 43 (2.8%)
Death 40 (2.6%)
Life Threatening 34 (2.2%)
Congenital Anomaly 23 (1.5%)
22 (1.4%)
D 6 (0.4%)
Other 5 (0.3%)
C 3 (0.2%)
O 2 (0.1%)

Top Product Problems

Insufficient Information 494
Gradient Increase 135
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem 81
Calcified 78
Patient Device Interaction Problem 51
Obstruction of Flow 38
Device Stenosis 37
Intravalvular regurgitation 36
Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size 26
Appropriate Term/Code Not Available 17
Degraded 13
Material Deformation 13
Occlusion Within Device 10
Incomplete Coaptation 9
Device Operates Differently Than Expected 7
Partial Blockage 6
Device Markings/Labelling Problem 5
Stretched 5
Leak/Splash 4
Material Split, Cut or Torn 4

Yearly Trend

02
2002: 6
03
2003: 1
04
2004: 16
05
2005: 17
06
2006: 11
07
2007: 16
08
2008: 16
09
2009: 11
10
2010: 15
11
2011: 12
12
2012: 10
13
2013: 10
14
2014: 49
15
2015: 74
16
2016: 105
17
2017: 96
18
2018: 111
19
2019: 128
20
2020: 83
21
2021: 79
22
2022: 67
23
2023: 57
24
2024: 69
25
2025: 41
26
2026: 7

Related Entities for Pulmonic Valved Conduit

Event Locations

I 720 (65.0%)
271 (24.5%)
HOSPITAL 112 (10.1%)
HOME 3 (0.3%)
INVALID DATA 1 (0.1%)

Compare MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION vs MEDTRONIC HEART VALVE DIVISION →

Data Source

FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database via the openFDA API. Reports are submitted by manufacturers, healthcare facilities, and patients. Report counts do not indicate a device is unsafe — higher-use devices naturally generate more reports.

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the FDA MAUDE database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.