2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Single Use Only Blood Lancet With An Integral Sharps Injury Prevention Feature

Open-data reference.

FDA MAUDE adverse event data · 1993–2026

What the Data Shows About Single Use Only Blood Lancet With An Integral Sharps Injury Prevention Feature

The FDA MAUDE database aggregates 14,056 adverse-event reports for Single Use Only Blood Lancet With An Integral Sharps Injury Prevention Feature spanning the period from 1993 through 2026. Of these, 2 are classified as death reports, 821 as injury reports, and 13,148 as malfunction reports under FDA adverse-event categorization rules. Report counts do not by themselves indicate a device is unsafe — widely used devices and longer market histories naturally generate larger raw counts, so proportional and comparative reads are more informative than totals alone.

The adverse-event profile breaks down across 5 distinct event types and 12 reported patient-outcome categories, giving a multi-dimensional view that goes beyond a single headline number. A total of 20 distinct product-problem codes appear in the reports, with Retraction Problem topping the list at 2,606 reports. Reports are associated with 10 different manufacturers in the MAUDE record, reflecting both OEMs and repackagers of this device category.

Annual reporting volume is tracked across 34 years of MAUDE data, with the peak single-year volume reaching 1,573 reports — trend shape often reflects changes in device adoption, reporting rules, or FDA enforcement focus rather than underlying device behavior alone. Events are documented across 25 reported care-setting categories (hospital, home, ambulatory surgery center, etc.). All figures reflect the openFDA MAUDE snapshot last refreshed on . This page is informational and is not medical advice — discuss device-safety questions with your healthcare provider.

14,056
Total Reports
2
Death Reports
821
Injury Reports
13,148
Malfunctions

Event Types

Malfunction 13,148 (93.5%)
Injury 821 (5.8%)
Other 66 (0.5%)
19 (0.1%)
Death 2 (0.0%)

Patient Outcomes

13,042 (91.7%)
Other 407 (2.9%)
Required Intervention 329 (2.3%)
Life Threatening 199 (1.4%)
R 129 (0.9%)
Hospitalization 72 (0.5%)
L 26 (0.2%)
O 7 (0.0%)
S 5 (0.0%)
Disability 4 (0.0%)
H 2 (0.0%)
Death 2 (0.0%)

Top Product Problems

Retraction Problem 2,606
Insufficient Information 142
Break 62
Product Quality Problem 49
Delivered as Unsterile Product 48
Material Fragmentation 47
Physical Property Issue 44
Difficult or Delayed Activation 42
Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material 39
Mechanical Problem 38
Material Protrusion/Extrusion 37
Defective Device 31
Packaging Problem 28
Defective Component 26
Device Damaged Prior to Use 26
Appropriate Term/Code Not Available 25
Device Markings/Labelling Problem 25
Material Integrity Problem 25
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem 24
Mechanics Altered 22

Yearly Trend

93
1993: 1
94
1994: 9
95
1995: 2
96
1996: 7
97
1997: 9
98
1998: 11
99
1999: 16
00
2000: 16
01
2001: 19
02
2002: 21
03
2003: 12
04
2004: 14
05
2005: 48
06
2006: 340
07
2007: 1,206
08
2008: 1,100
09
2009: 882
10
2010: 910
11
2011: 1,493
12
2012: 1,573
13
2013: 1,301
14
2014: 890
15
2015: 781
16
2016: 539
17
2017: 531
18
2018: 534
19
2019: 399
20
2020: 313
21
2021: 245
22
2022: 254
23
2023: 282
24
2024: 243
25
2025: 47
26
2026: 8

Related Entities for Single Use Only Blood Lancet With An Integral Sharps Injury Prevention Feature

Event Locations

U 3,669 (26.1%)
OTHER 3,414 (24.3%)
2,197 (15.6%)
HOME 1,917 (13.6%)
I 1,722 (12.3%)
UNKNOWN 456 (3.2%)
HOSPITAL 239 (1.7%)
LABORATORY 185 (1.3%)
SCHOOL 70 (0.5%)
NURSING HOME 40 (0.3%)
NO INFORMATION 33 (0.2%)
PATIENT'S HOME 32 (0.2%)
NOT APPLICABLE 30 (0.2%)
CLINIC - WALK IN, OTHER 15 (0.1%)
AMBULATORY HEALTH CARE FACILITY 11 (0.1%)
LONG-TERM CARE FACILITY 5 (0.0%)
OUTPATIENT TREATMENT FACILITY 5 (0.0%)
INVALID DATA 4 (0.0%)
RETIREMENT HOME 4 (0.0%)
AMBULATORY SURGICAL FACILITY 2 (0.0%)
REHABILITATION CENTER 2 (0.0%)
DIALYSIS CENTER 1 (0.0%)
OUTPATIENT CLINIC/SURGERY 1 (0.0%)
OUTPATIENT DIAGNOSTIC FACILITY 1 (0.0%)
PUBLIC BUILDING 1 (0.0%)

Compare ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS vs ROCHE DIABETES CARE, INC. →

Data Source

FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database via the openFDA API. Reports are submitted by manufacturers, healthcare facilities, and patients. Report counts do not indicate a device is unsafe — higher-use devices naturally generate more reports.

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the FDA MAUDE database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.