2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Temporary Catheter, Embolic Protection, Transcatheter Intracardiac Procedures

Open-data reference.

FDA MAUDE adverse event data · 2018–2026

What the Data Shows About Temporary Catheter, Embolic Protection, Transcatheter Intracardiac Procedures

The FDA MAUDE database aggregates 347 adverse-event reports for Temporary Catheter, Embolic Protection, Transcatheter Intracardiac Procedures spanning the period from 2018 through 2026. Of these, 5 are classified as death reports, 71 as injury reports, and 271 as malfunction reports under FDA adverse-event categorization rules. Report counts do not by themselves indicate a device is unsafe — widely used devices and longer market histories naturally generate larger raw counts, so proportional and comparative reads are more informative than totals alone.

The adverse-event profile breaks down across 3 distinct event types and 11 reported patient-outcome categories, giving a multi-dimensional view that goes beyond a single headline number. A total of 20 distinct product-problem codes appear in the reports, with Difficult to Remove topping the list at 150 reports. Reports are associated with 6 different manufacturers in the MAUDE record, reflecting both OEMs and repackagers of this device category.

Annual reporting volume is tracked across 9 years of MAUDE data, with the peak single-year volume reaching 73 reports — trend shape often reflects changes in device adoption, reporting rules, or FDA enforcement focus rather than underlying device behavior alone. Events are documented across 5 reported care-setting categories (hospital, home, ambulatory surgery center, etc.). All figures reflect the openFDA MAUDE snapshot last refreshed on . This page is informational and is not medical advice — discuss device-safety questions with your healthcare provider.

347
Total Reports
5
Death Reports
71
Injury Reports
271
Malfunctions

Event Types

Malfunction 271 (78.1%)
Injury 71 (20.5%)
Death 5 (1.4%)

Patient Outcomes

277 (77.8%)
Other 32 (9.0%)
Required Intervention 20 (5.6%)
Hospitalization 10 (2.8%)
O 4 (1.1%)
Death 4 (1.1%)
Disability 4 (1.1%)
R 2 (0.6%)
D 1 (0.3%)
H 1 (0.3%)
S 1 (0.3%)

Top Product Problems

Difficult to Remove 150
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem 122
Break 64
Positioning Failure 61
Positioning Problem 58
Defective Device 34
Material Integrity Problem 23
Failure to Advance 19
Difficult or Delayed Positioning 17
Detachment of Device or Device Component 14
Device-Device Incompatibility 14
Mechanical Problem 8
Difficult to Advance 7
Material Deformation 7
Material Twisted/Bent 6
Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem 3
Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material 3
Entrapment of Device 3
Material Separation 3
Nonstandard Device 3

Yearly Trend

18
2018: 19
19
2019: 48
20
2020: 73
21
2021: 43
22
2022: 40
23
2023: 24
24
2024: 45
25
2025: 50
26
2026: 5

Related Entities for Temporary Catheter, Embolic Protection, Transcatheter Intracardiac Procedures

Event Locations

166 (47.8%)
I 144 (41.5%)
HOSPITAL 32 (9.2%)
NO INFORMATION 4 (1.2%)
OTHER 1 (0.3%)

Compare BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION vs CLARET MEDICAL, INC. →

Data Source

FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database via the openFDA API. Reports are submitted by manufacturers, healthcare facilities, and patients. Report counts do not indicate a device is unsafe — higher-use devices naturally generate more reports.

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the FDA MAUDE database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.