PlainHospital

Florida · Acute Care

Adventhealth Dade City

Adventhealth Dade City holds a 4 of 5 CMS overall star rating — above the national average of 3.1 — in Dade City, FL.

4★
CMS overall rating
63th
National percentile
20
Quality measures
36
Infection measures

13100 Ft King Rd, Dade City, FL 33525 · Pasco County · (352) 568-1100

The verdict

Adventhealth Dade City earns 4 of 5 stars from CMS — above the 3.1-star national average — and reports 1 quality measure better than the national benchmark.

4 / 5
CMS overall star rating
Higher than 63%
of 2,866 rated US hospitals
1
measures better than national of 14 compared
No
emergency department on site

All figures from the CMS Hospital Compare release of 2026-05-15. This page is informational and not medical advice.

Where Adventhealth Dade City sits among rated US hospitals

CMS overall star rating — count of hospitals at each rating, this hospital marked

4 Top 37% higher than 63% of 2,866 rated hospitals

1–2: 229 rated hospitals (8%). Below this entry. 2–3: 649 rated hospitals (23%). Below this entry. 3–4: 935 rated hospitals (33%). Below this entry. 4–5: 765 rated hospitals (27%). This entry sits in this band. 5–6: 288 rated hospitals (10%). Above this entry. This hospital 1★ 5★ CMS star rating (1–5 stars), bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more rated hospitals. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Hospital Compare — overall hospital rating · 2026-05-15

Adventhealth Dade City vs. Florida and the nation

CMS overall star rating (out of 5) — this hospital against the state and national averages

stars

What this shows At 4 stars, Adventhealth Dade City rates above the Florida average of 2.8 and above the national average of 3.1.

Source CMS Hospital Compare As of 2026-05-15
Type
Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership
Proprietary
Emergency Services
No
Birthing Friendly
N/A

Quality Measures

20

CMS-tracked

Patient Experience

68

HCAHPS domains

Infection Measures

36

CDC NHSN

CMS Overall Star Rating 80.0%

4 of 5 stars

Quality profile vs. the national benchmark

How Adventhealth Dade City performs across CMS's three outcome domains — each bar shows the share of measures rated better, the same, or worse than the national average.

Mortality 5 measures
Safety of care 3 measures
Readmission 6 measures
Better than national Same as national Worse than national

Quality Measures

Detailed quality measure performance compared to national benchmarks

Measure Score vs. National
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate 1 Same as National
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite 0.89 Same as National
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Death rate for CABG surgery patients N/A Not Available
Death rate for COPD patients 7.7 Same as National
Death rate for heart attack patients 11.5 Same as National
Death rate for heart failure patients 10.9 Same as National
Death rate for pneumonia patients 14.1 Same as National
Death rate for stroke patients 11.4 Same as National
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate 3.7 Same as National
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate 0.19 Same as National
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate 0.29 Same as National
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate 3.69 Same as National
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate 1.66 Same as National
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate 2.24 Same as National

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Patient satisfaction survey results measuring hospital care quality

Survey Question Star Rating
Cleanliness - linear mean score
Cleanliness - linear mean score
 N/A
Cleanliness - star rating
Cleanliness - star rating
 4
Communication about medicines - linear mean score
Communication about medicines - linear mean score
 N/A
Communication about medicines - star rating
Communication about medicines - star rating
 3
Discharge information - linear mean score
Discharge information - linear mean score
 N/A
Discharge information - star rating
Discharge information - star rating
 3
Doctor communication - linear mean score
Doctor communication - linear mean score
 N/A
Doctor communication - star rating
Doctor communication - star rating
 3
Nurse communication - linear mean score
Nurse communication - linear mean score
 N/A
Nurse communication - star rating
Nurse communication - star rating
 4
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
 N/A
Overall hospital rating - star rating
Overall hospital rating - star rating
 4
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)
Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low)
 N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)
Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium)
 N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)
Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high)
 N/A
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital
"NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it)
 N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge
No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge
 N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge
No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms
 N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home
No, staff "did not" give patients this information
 N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them
Staff "always" explained
 N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained
 N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them
Staff "usually" explained
 N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night
"Always" quiet at night
 N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night
"Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night
 N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night
"Usually" quiet at night
 N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well
Doctors "always" communicated well
 N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand
Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand
 N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them
Doctors "always" listened carefully
 N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect
Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect
 N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect
 N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well
 N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand
 N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully
 N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
 N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well
Doctors "usually" communicated well
 N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand
Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand
 N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them
Doctors "usually" listened carefully
 N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well
Nurses "always" communicated well
 N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand
Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand
 N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them
Nurses "always" listened carefully
 N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect
Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect
 N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect
 N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well
 N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand
 N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully
 N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
 N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well
Nurses "usually" communicated well
 N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand
Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand
 N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them
Nurses "usually" listened carefully
 N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean
Room was "always" clean
 N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean
Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean
 N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean
Room was "usually" clean
 N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for
Staff "always" explained new medications
 N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects
Staff "always" explained possible side effects
 N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications
 N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects
 N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.
Staff "usually" explained new medications
 N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects
Staff "usually" explained possible side effects
 N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge
Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge
 N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge
Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms
 N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home
Yes, staff "did" give patients this information
 N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital
"YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital
 N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital
"YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital
 N/A
Quietness - linear mean score
Quietness - linear mean score
 N/A
Quietness - star rating
Quietness - star rating
 2
Recommend hospital - linear mean score
Recommend hospital - linear mean score
 N/A
Recommend hospital - star rating
Recommend hospital - star rating
 4
Summary star rating
Summary star rating
 3

Safety & Infections

Healthcare-associated infection rates compared to national benchmarks

Measure Score vs. National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) 0 Same as National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit N/A Same as National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days 1619 Same as National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 0 Same as National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 1.223 Same as National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 2.449 Same as National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) N/A Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 0 Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 0.869 Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days 1101 Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) 0 Better than National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit N/A Better than National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases 0 Better than National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days 19846 Better than National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases 7.555 Better than National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit 0.397 Better than National
MRSA Bacteremia N/A Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases 0 Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days 19846 Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases 0.884 Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy N/A Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures 14 Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases 0 Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases 0.142 Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery N/A Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures 24 Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases 0 Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases 0.615 Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit N/A Not Available

Staffing & Spending

Medicare spending per episode and unplanned visit measures

Unplanned Visits & Readmissions

Measure Score vs. National
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate 13.1 Same as National
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate 20.6 Same as National
Hospital return days for heart attack patients N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Hospital return days for heart failure patients 23.9 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients -56.8 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR) 14.8 Same as National
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate 13.7 Same as National
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacement N/A Not Available
Rate of readmission for CABG N/A Not Available
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients 19.6 Same as National
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies) 12.6 Same as National
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery 0.9 Same as National

Medicare Spending

Measure Score
Medicare hospital spending per patient (Medicare Spending per Beneficiary) 1.02

Maternal Health

Maternal care quality measures including C-section rates and outcomes

Measure Score
Cesarean Birth N/A
Maternal Morbidity Structural Measure N/A
Risk Adjusted Severe Obstetric Complications (All) N/A
Risk Adjusted Severe Obstetric Complications (excluding blood-transfusion-only cases) N/A

Nearby Hospitals in Florida

Other Medicare-certified hospitals in Florida — tap any card for its full quality profile.

96th Medical Group (Eglin AFB)
Eglin AFB, FL
No rating Acute Care - Department of Defense
Adventhealth Carrollwood
Tampa, FL
3/5 Acute Care Hospitals
Adventhealth Daytona Beach
Daytona Beach, FL
4/5 Acute Care Hospitals
Adventhealth Deland
Deland, FL
4/5 Acute Care Hospitals
Adventhealth Fish Memorial
Orange City, FL
5/5 Acute Care Hospitals
Adventhealth Heart of Florida
Davenport, FL
2/5 Acute Care Hospitals

Compare Adventhealth Dade City vs 96th Medical Group (Eglin AFB) →

Hospital Quality Guides

Learn how to interpret hospital quality data and make informed healthcare decisions

Understanding Hospital Star Ratings
How CMS calculates star ratings and what they measure
Hospital Quality Measures Explained
Patient experience, safety, readmission, and mortality measures
How to Choose a Hospital with Data
Using CMS quality data for planned procedures and emergency care
View all guides →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the CMS star rating for Adventhealth Dade City?

Adventhealth Dade City has an overall CMS star rating of 4 out of 5. CMS star ratings are based on multiple quality measures including mortality, safety of care, readmission rates, patient experience, and timely and effective care.

How does Adventhealth Dade City perform on quality measures?

Adventhealth Dade City has 1 quality measures rated better than the national average and 0 rated worse. 20 total quality measures are tracked for this facility.

What do patients say about Adventhealth Dade City?

Patient experience at Adventhealth Dade City is measured through HCAHPS surveys covering 68 categories including communication with doctors, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, and discharge information. Patient survey star ratings range from 2 to 4 out of 5.

What are the infection rates at Adventhealth Dade City?

Adventhealth Dade City tracks 36 healthcare-associated infection measures. 6 are better than the national benchmark, 0 are worse, and 6 are at the national average.

Does Adventhealth Dade City have emergency services?

No, Adventhealth Dade City does not provide emergency services. For emergencies, seek care at a nearby facility with an emergency department.

What type of hospital is Adventhealth Dade City?

Adventhealth Dade City is a Acute Care Hospitals facility with Proprietary ownership, located in Dade City, FL.

How much does Medicare spend at Adventhealth Dade City?

Medicare spending data is available for Adventhealth Dade City across 1 spending categories. These measures compare the hospital's spending per episode to the national median.

Does Adventhealth Dade City offer maternal health services?

Yes, Adventhealth Dade City reports maternal health data including 4 measures such as C-section rates and maternal morbidity outcomes.

Data Sources

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare. Last refreshed from CMS: .

Hospital quality data is sourced from the CMS Hospital Compare program, with patient-experience scores drawn from the HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey. Data includes overall star ratings, quality measures, healthcare-associated infections, unplanned visits, Medicare spending, and maternal health measures.

Source: CMS Hospital Compare. This information is not medical advice. Learn more

Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

All federal data sources used on this page

Verify with CDC →