Georgia · Acute Care

APPLING HEALTHCARE

APPLING HEALTHCARE is a CMS-tracked acute care hospitals in BAXLEY, GA. CMS has not issued an overall star rating for this facility yet.

20
Quality measures
36
Infection measures

163 E TOLLISON STREET, BAXLEY, GA 31513 · APPLING County · (912) 367-9841

The verdict

APPLING HEALTHCARE is Medicare-certified but has no CMS overall star rating yet — typically a sign its reporting volumes fell below CMS's thresholds during the latest measurement window. 20 individual quality measures are still on file.

0
measures better than national of 3 compared
Yes
emergency department on site

All figures from the CMS Hospital Compare release of 2026-05-15. This page is informational and not medical advice.

Type
Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership
Government - Hospital District or Authority
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
N/A

Quality Measures

20

CMS-tracked

Patient Experience

68

HCAHPS domains

Infection Measures

36

CDC NHSN

Quality profile vs. the national benchmark

How APPLING HEALTHCARE performs across CMS's three outcome domains — each bar shows the share of measures rated better, the same, or worse than the national average.

Mortality 1 measure
Safety of care 0 measures
No measures reported
Readmission 2 measures
Better than national Same as national Worse than national

Quality Measures

Detailed quality measure performance compared to national benchmarks

Measure Score vs. National
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate N/A Not Available
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite N/A Not Available
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications N/A Not Available
Death rate for CABG surgery patients N/A Not Available
Death rate for COPD patients N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Death rate for heart attack patients N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Death rate for heart failure patients N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Death rate for pneumonia patients 18 Same as National
Death rate for stroke patients N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate 4.9 Same as National
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate 0.21 Same as National
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate 0.27 Same as National
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate N/A Not Available
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate N/A Not Available
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate N/A Not Available

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Patient satisfaction survey results measuring hospital care quality

Survey Question Star Rating
Cleanliness - linear mean score
Cleanliness - linear mean score
N/A
Cleanliness - star rating
Cleanliness - star rating
N/A
Communication about medicines - linear mean score
Communication about medicines - linear mean score
N/A
Communication about medicines - star rating
Communication about medicines - star rating
N/A
Discharge information - linear mean score
Discharge information - linear mean score
N/A
Discharge information - star rating
Discharge information - star rating
N/A
Doctor communication - linear mean score
Doctor communication - linear mean score
N/A
Doctor communication - star rating
Doctor communication - star rating
N/A
Nurse communication - linear mean score
Nurse communication - linear mean score
N/A
Nurse communication - star rating
Nurse communication - star rating
N/A
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
N/A
Overall hospital rating - star rating
Overall hospital rating - star rating
N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)
Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low)
N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)
Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium)
N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)
Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high)
N/A
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital
"NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it)
N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge
No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge
N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge
No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms
N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home
No, staff "did not" give patients this information
N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them
Staff "always" explained
N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained
N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them
Staff "usually" explained
N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night
"Always" quiet at night
N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night
"Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night
N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night
"Usually" quiet at night
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well
Doctors "always" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand
Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them
Doctors "always" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect
Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well
Doctors "usually" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand
Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them
Doctors "usually" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well
Nurses "always" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand
Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them
Nurses "always" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect
Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well
Nurses "usually" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand
Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them
Nurses "usually" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean
Room was "always" clean
N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean
Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean
N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean
Room was "usually" clean
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for
Staff "always" explained new medications
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects
Staff "always" explained possible side effects
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.
Staff "usually" explained new medications
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects
Staff "usually" explained possible side effects
N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge
Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge
N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge
Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms
N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home
Yes, staff "did" give patients this information
N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital
"YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital
N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital
"YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital
N/A
Quietness - linear mean score
Quietness - linear mean score
N/A
Quietness - star rating
Quietness - star rating
N/A
Recommend hospital - linear mean score
Recommend hospital - linear mean score
N/A
Recommend hospital - star rating
Recommend hospital - star rating
N/A
Summary star rating
Summary star rating
N/A

Safety & Infections

Healthcare-associated infection rates compared to national benchmarks

Measure Score vs. National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) N/A Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days 170 Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 0 Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 0.083 Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) N/A Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 0 Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 0.016 Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days 27 Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) N/A Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases 0 Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days 1894 Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases 0.45 Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia N/A Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases 0 Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days 1894 Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases 0.049 Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy N/A Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures N/A Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases N/A Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases N/A Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery N/A Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures N/A Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases N/A Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases N/A Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit N/A Not Available

Staffing & Spending

Medicare spending per episode and unplanned visit measures

Unplanned Visits & Readmissions

Measure Score vs. National
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate N/A Not Available
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Hospital return days for heart attack patients N/A Not Available
Hospital return days for heart failure patients N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients 66.3 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR) 15.3 Same as National
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate 16.4 Same as National
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy N/A Not Available
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy N/A Not Available
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacement N/A Not Available
Rate of readmission for CABG N/A Not Available
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies) N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery N/A Not Available

Medicare Spending

Measure Score
Medicare hospital spending per patient (Medicare Spending per Beneficiary) 0.9

Maternal Health

Maternal care quality measures including C-section rates and outcomes

Measure Score
Cesarean Birth N/A
Maternal Morbidity Structural Measure N/A
Risk Adjusted Severe Obstetric Complications (All) N/A
Risk Adjusted Severe Obstetric Complications (excluding blood-transfusion-only cases) N/A

Nearby Hospitals in Georgia

Other Medicare-certified hospitals in Georgia — tap any card for its full quality profile.

Compare APPLING HEALTHCARE vs ADVENTHEALTH GORDON →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the CMS star rating for APPLING HEALTHCARE?

APPLING HEALTHCARE does not currently have a CMS star rating. This may be due to insufficient data for the rating calculation period.

How does APPLING HEALTHCARE perform on quality measures?

APPLING HEALTHCARE has 0 quality measures rated better than the national average and 0 rated worse. 20 total quality measures are tracked for this facility.

What do patients say about APPLING HEALTHCARE?

Patient experience at APPLING HEALTHCARE is measured through HCAHPS surveys covering 68 categories including communication with doctors, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, and discharge information.

What are the infection rates at APPLING HEALTHCARE?

APPLING HEALTHCARE tracks 36 healthcare-associated infection measures. 0 are better than the national benchmark, 0 are worse, and 0 are at the national average.

Does APPLING HEALTHCARE have emergency services?

Yes, APPLING HEALTHCARE provides emergency services.

What type of hospital is APPLING HEALTHCARE?

APPLING HEALTHCARE is a Acute Care Hospitals facility with Government - Hospital District or Authority ownership, located in BAXLEY, GA.

How much does Medicare spend at APPLING HEALTHCARE?

Medicare spending data is available for APPLING HEALTHCARE across 1 spending categories. These measures compare the hospital's spending per episode to the national median.

Does APPLING HEALTHCARE offer maternal health services?

Yes, APPLING HEALTHCARE reports maternal health data including 4 measures such as C-section rates and maternal morbidity outcomes.

Data Sources

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare. Last refreshed from CMS: .

Hospital quality data is sourced from the CMS Hospital Compare program, with patient-experience scores drawn from the HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey. Data includes overall star ratings, quality measures, healthcare-associated infections, unplanned visits, Medicare spending, and maternal health measures.

Source: CMS Hospital Compare. This information is not medical advice. Learn more

All federal data sources used on this page

Verify with CDC →