RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

3/5

1155 MILL STREET, RENO, NV 89502

WASHOE County

RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER is a Acute Care Hospitals located in RENO, NV, with Voluntary non-profit - Private ownership, according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare program. CMS overall quality rating: 3 out of 5 stars, based on quality measures covering patient safety, patient experience (HCAHPS), readmission rates, and timeliness of care. Emergency services are available. This hospital performs better than the national average on 4 quality measures.

What the Data Shows About RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER is classified by CMS as a Acute Care Hospitals under Voluntary non-profit - Private ownership, serving RENO, NV (WASHOE County, ZIP 89502). Its overall CMS star rating is 3/5, a composite signal drawn from mortality outcomes, safety of care, readmission rates, patient experience (HCAHPS), and timely & effective care measures. Emergency services are available on site, and the facility carries the CMS Birthing-Friendly designation.

Across the quality-measure domains CMS tracks, RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER posts 4 measures better than the national average and 4 measures worse, drawn from mortality (0 better / 2 worse), safety of care (4 better / 0 worse), and readmission (0 better / 2 worse). A total of 20 individual quality measures are reported for this facility, covering everything from sepsis care to surgical complications. The facility also reports 36 healthcare-associated infection measures under the CDC NHSN surveillance system.

Patient-experience data from the HCAHPS survey spans 68 domains at this hospital, including communication with doctors and nurses, staff responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge information — together these give a real-world read on how patients rate their stay. Medicare episode-of-care spending is tracked across 1 category, benchmarked against the national median. Maternal health reporting covers 4 measures, including C-section rates and maternal morbidity outcomes. All figures reflect the CMS Hospital Compare release from , and none of this page constitutes medical advice — always consult a clinician before choosing or changing care.

Type
Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership
Voluntary non-profit - Private
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
Phone: (775) 982-4100

Quality Measures

20

CMS-tracked

Patient Experience

68

HCAHPS domains

Infection Measures

36

CDC NHSN

CMS Overall Star Rating 60.0%

3 of 5 stars

Quality Summary

Mortality

Better than National0
Same as National5
Worse than National2

Safety of Care

Better than National4
Same as National3
Worse than National0

Readmission

Better than National0
Same as National8
Worse than National2

Quality Measures

Detailed quality measure performance compared to national benchmarks

Measure Score vs. National
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate 1.14 Same as National
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite 1.04 Same as National
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications 231.33 Worse than National
Death rate for CABG surgery patients 2 Same as National
Death rate for COPD patients 10.6 Same as National
Death rate for heart attack patients 11.4 Same as National
Death rate for heart failure patients 11.9 Same as National
Death rate for pneumonia patients 16.4 Same as National
Death rate for stroke patients 14.4 Same as National
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate 3.7 Same as National
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate 0.27 Same as National
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate 0.33 Same as National
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate 4.71 Same as National
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate 2.62 Same as National
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate 3.24 Same as National

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Patient satisfaction survey results measuring hospital care quality

Survey Question Star Rating
Cleanliness - linear mean score
Cleanliness - linear mean score
N/A
Cleanliness - star rating
Cleanliness - star rating
2
Communication about medicines - linear mean score
Communication about medicines - linear mean score
N/A
Communication about medicines - star rating
Communication about medicines - star rating
2
Discharge information - linear mean score
Discharge information - linear mean score
N/A
Discharge information - star rating
Discharge information - star rating
3
Doctor communication - linear mean score
Doctor communication - linear mean score
N/A
Doctor communication - star rating
Doctor communication - star rating
2
Nurse communication - linear mean score
Nurse communication - linear mean score
N/A
Nurse communication - star rating
Nurse communication - star rating
3
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
N/A
Overall hospital rating - star rating
Overall hospital rating - star rating
3
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)
Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low)
N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)
Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium)
N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)
Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high)
N/A
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital
"NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it)
N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge
No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge
N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge
No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms
N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home
No, staff "did not" give patients this information
N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them
Staff "always" explained
N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained
N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them
Staff "usually" explained
N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night
"Always" quiet at night
N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night
"Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night
N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night
"Usually" quiet at night
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well
Doctors "always" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand
Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them
Doctors "always" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect
Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well
Doctors "usually" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand
Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them
Doctors "usually" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well
Nurses "always" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand
Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them
Nurses "always" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect
Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well
Nurses "usually" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand
Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them
Nurses "usually" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean
Room was "always" clean
N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean
Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean
N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean
Room was "usually" clean
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for
Staff "always" explained new medications
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects
Staff "always" explained possible side effects
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.
Staff "usually" explained new medications
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects
Staff "usually" explained possible side effects
N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge
Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge
N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge
Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms
N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home
Yes, staff "did" give patients this information
N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital
"YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital
N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital
"YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital
N/A
Quietness - linear mean score
Quietness - linear mean score
N/A
Quietness - star rating
Quietness - star rating
2
Recommend hospital - linear mean score
Recommend hospital - linear mean score
N/A
Recommend hospital - star rating
Recommend hospital - star rating
4
Summary star rating
Summary star rating
3

Safety & Infections

Healthcare-associated infection rates compared to national benchmarks

Measure Score vs. National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) 0.38 Better than National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 0.206 Better than National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days 18067 Better than National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 12 Better than National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 31.581 Better than National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 0.646 Better than National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) 0.597 Same as National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 0.324 Same as National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 12 Same as National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 20.097 Same as National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 1.015 Same as National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days 16744 Same as National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) 0.615 Better than National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit 0.462 Better than National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases 50 Better than National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days 157815 Better than National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases 81.261 Better than National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit 0.805 Better than National
MRSA Bacteremia 0.2 Better than National
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit 0.051 Better than National
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases 3 Better than National
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days 173707 Better than National
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases 14.966 Better than National
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit 0.546 Better than National
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy 0 Same as National
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit N/A Same as National
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures 137 Same as National
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases 0 Same as National
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases 1.139 Same as National
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit 2.63 Same as National
SSI - Colon Surgery 0.482 Same as National
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit 0.177 Same as National
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures 369 Same as National
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases 5 Same as National
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases 10.364 Same as National
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit 1.069 Same as National

Staffing & Spending

Medicare spending per episode and unplanned visit measures

Unplanned Visits & Readmissions

Measure Score vs. National
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate 12.3 Same as National
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate 19.3 Same as National
Hospital return days for heart attack patients -11.1 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for heart failure patients 2.9 Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients 1.2 Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR) 15.1 Same as National
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate 16.2 Same as National
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy 4.8 Same as National
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy 7.9 Better than National
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacement N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Rate of readmission for CABG 9.1 Same as National
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients 18.8 Same as National
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies) 13.3 Same as National
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery 1.1 Same as National

Medicare Spending

Measure Score
Medicare hospital spending per patient (Medicare Spending per Beneficiary) 1.03

Maternal Health

Maternal care quality measures including C-section rates and outcomes

Measure Score
Cesarean Birth N/A
Maternal Morbidity Structural Measure N/A
Risk Adjusted Severe Obstetric Complications (All) N/A
Risk Adjusted Severe Obstetric Complications (excluding blood-transfusion-only cases) N/A

Nearby Hospitals in Nevada

Other Medicare-certified hospitals in Nevada — tap any card for its full quality profile.

Compare RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER vs 99th Medical Group (Nellis AFB) →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the CMS star rating for RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER?

RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER has an overall CMS star rating of 3 out of 5. CMS star ratings are based on multiple quality measures including mortality, safety of care, readmission rates, patient experience, and timely and effective care.

How does RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER perform on quality measures?

RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER has 4 quality measures rated better than the national average and 4 rated worse. 20 total quality measures are tracked for this facility.

What do patients say about RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER?

Patient experience at RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER is measured through HCAHPS surveys covering 68 categories including communication with doctors, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, and discharge information. Patient survey star ratings range from 2 to 4 out of 5.

What are the infection rates at RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER?

RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER tracks 36 healthcare-associated infection measures. 18 are better than the national benchmark, 0 are worse, and 18 are at the national average.

Does RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER have emergency services?

Yes, RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER provides emergency services.

What type of hospital is RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER?

RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER is a Acute Care Hospitals facility with Voluntary non-profit - Private ownership, located in RENO, NV. This facility has received the CMS Birthing-Friendly designation.

How much does Medicare spend at RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER?

Medicare spending data is available for RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER across 1 spending categories. These measures compare the hospital's spending per episode to the national median.

Does RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER offer maternal health services?

Yes, RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER reports maternal health data including 4 measures such as C-section rates and maternal morbidity outcomes. This facility has been designated as Birthing-Friendly by CMS.

Data Sources

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare. Last refreshed from CMS: .

Hospital quality data is sourced from the CMS Hospital Compare program, with patient-experience scores drawn from the HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey. Data includes overall star ratings, quality measures, healthcare-associated infections, unplanned visits, Medicare spending, and maternal health measures.

Source: CMS Hospital Compare. This information is not medical advice. Learn more

All federal data sources used on this page

Verify with CDC →