RIVERS HEALTH

1/5

2520 VALLEY DRIVE, POINT PLEASANT, WV 25550

MASON County

RIVERS HEALTH is a Acute Care Hospitals located in POINT PLEASANT, WV, with Voluntary non-profit - Private ownership, according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare program. CMS overall quality rating: 1 out of 5 stars, based on quality measures covering patient safety, patient experience (HCAHPS), readmission rates, and timeliness of care. Emergency services are available.

What the Data Shows About RIVERS HEALTH

RIVERS HEALTH is classified by CMS as a Acute Care Hospitals under Voluntary non-profit - Private ownership, serving POINT PLEASANT, WV (MASON County, ZIP 25550). Its overall CMS star rating is 1/5, a composite signal drawn from mortality outcomes, safety of care, readmission rates, patient experience (HCAHPS), and timely & effective care measures. Emergency services are available on site, and the facility does not currently carry the CMS Birthing-Friendly designation.

Across the quality-measure domains CMS tracks, RIVERS HEALTH posts 0 measures better than the national average and 1 measure worse, drawn from mortality (0 better / 0 worse), safety of care (0 better / 0 worse), and readmission (0 better / 1 worse). A total of 20 individual quality measures are reported for this facility, covering everything from sepsis care to surgical complications. The facility also reports 36 healthcare-associated infection measures under the CDC NHSN surveillance system.

Patient-experience data from the HCAHPS survey spans 68 domains at this hospital, including communication with doctors and nurses, staff responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge information — together these give a real-world read on how patients rate their stay. Medicare episode-of-care spending is tracked across 1 category, benchmarked against the national median. Maternal health reporting covers 4 measures, including C-section rates and maternal morbidity outcomes. All figures reflect the CMS Hospital Compare release from , and none of this page constitutes medical advice — always consult a clinician before choosing or changing care.

Type
Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership
Voluntary non-profit - Private
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
N/A
Phone: (304) 675-4340

Quality Measures

20

CMS-tracked

Patient Experience

68

HCAHPS domains

Infection Measures

36

CDC NHSN

CMS Overall Star Rating 20.0%

1 of 5 stars

Quality Summary

Mortality

Better than National0
Same as National3
Worse than National0

Safety of Care

Better than National0
Same as National2
Worse than National0

Readmission

Better than National0
Same as National5
Worse than National1

Quality Measures

Detailed quality measure performance compared to national benchmarks

Measure Score vs. National
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate 1.06 Same as National
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite 0.98 Same as National
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Death rate for CABG surgery patients N/A Not Available
Death rate for COPD patients 10.4 Same as National
Death rate for heart attack patients N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Death rate for heart failure patients 12.2 Same as National
Death rate for pneumonia patients 18.7 Same as National
Death rate for stroke patients N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate 4.4 Same as National
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate 0.21 Same as National
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate 0.31 Same as National
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate N/A Number of Cases Too Small

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Patient satisfaction survey results measuring hospital care quality

Survey Question Star Rating
Cleanliness - linear mean score
Cleanliness - linear mean score
N/A
Cleanliness - star rating
Cleanliness - star rating
4
Communication about medicines - linear mean score
Communication about medicines - linear mean score
N/A
Communication about medicines - star rating
Communication about medicines - star rating
2
Discharge information - linear mean score
Discharge information - linear mean score
N/A
Discharge information - star rating
Discharge information - star rating
3
Doctor communication - linear mean score
Doctor communication - linear mean score
N/A
Doctor communication - star rating
Doctor communication - star rating
2
Nurse communication - linear mean score
Nurse communication - linear mean score
N/A
Nurse communication - star rating
Nurse communication - star rating
3
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
N/A
Overall hospital rating - star rating
Overall hospital rating - star rating
3
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)
Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low)
N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)
Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium)
N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)
Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high)
N/A
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital
"NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it)
N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge
No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge
N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge
No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms
N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home
No, staff "did not" give patients this information
N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them
Staff "always" explained
N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained
N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them
Staff "usually" explained
N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night
"Always" quiet at night
N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night
"Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night
N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night
"Usually" quiet at night
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well
Doctors "always" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand
Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them
Doctors "always" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect
Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well
Doctors "usually" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand
Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them
Doctors "usually" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well
Nurses "always" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand
Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them
Nurses "always" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect
Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well
Nurses "usually" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand
Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them
Nurses "usually" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean
Room was "always" clean
N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean
Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean
N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean
Room was "usually" clean
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for
Staff "always" explained new medications
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects
Staff "always" explained possible side effects
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.
Staff "usually" explained new medications
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects
Staff "usually" explained possible side effects
N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge
Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge
N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge
Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms
N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home
Yes, staff "did" give patients this information
N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital
"YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital
N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital
"YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital
N/A
Quietness - linear mean score
Quietness - linear mean score
N/A
Quietness - star rating
Quietness - star rating
2
Recommend hospital - linear mean score
Recommend hospital - linear mean score
N/A
Recommend hospital - star rating
Recommend hospital - star rating
2
Summary star rating
Summary star rating
3

Safety & Infections

Healthcare-associated infection rates compared to national benchmarks

Measure Score vs. National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) N/A Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days 911 Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 1 Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 0.712 Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) N/A Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 0 Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 0.702 Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days 892 Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) 1.565 Same as National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit 0.574 Same as National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases 5 Same as National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days 7695 Same as National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases 3.194 Same as National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit 3.47 Same as National
MRSA Bacteremia N/A Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases 0 Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days 7695 Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases 0.228 Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy N/A Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures N/A Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases N/A Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases N/A Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery N/A Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit N/A Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures N/A Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases N/A Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases N/A Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit N/A Not Available

Staffing & Spending

Medicare spending per episode and unplanned visit measures

Unplanned Visits & Readmissions

Measure Score vs. National
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate 21 Same as National
Hospital return days for heart attack patients N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Hospital return days for heart failure patients 112.7 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients 53.5 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR) 15.1 Same as National
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate 16.6 Same as National
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy N/A Number of Cases Too Small
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacement N/A Not Available
Rate of readmission for CABG N/A Not Available
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients 18.6 Same as National
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies) 13 Same as National
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery 1.1 Same as National

Medicare Spending

Measure Score
Medicare hospital spending per patient (Medicare Spending per Beneficiary) 1

Maternal Health

Maternal care quality measures including C-section rates and outcomes

Measure Score
Cesarean Birth N/A
Maternal Morbidity Structural Measure N/A
Risk Adjusted Severe Obstetric Complications (All) N/A
Risk Adjusted Severe Obstetric Complications (excluding blood-transfusion-only cases) N/A

Nearby Hospitals in West Virginia

Other Medicare-certified hospitals in West Virginia — tap any card for its full quality profile.

Compare RIVERS HEALTH vs BECKLEY ARH HOSPITAL →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the CMS star rating for RIVERS HEALTH?

RIVERS HEALTH has an overall CMS star rating of 1 out of 5. CMS star ratings are based on multiple quality measures including mortality, safety of care, readmission rates, patient experience, and timely and effective care.

How does RIVERS HEALTH perform on quality measures?

RIVERS HEALTH has 0 quality measures rated better than the national average and 1 rated worse. 20 total quality measures are tracked for this facility.

What do patients say about RIVERS HEALTH?

Patient experience at RIVERS HEALTH is measured through HCAHPS surveys covering 68 categories including communication with doctors, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, and discharge information. Patient survey star ratings range from 2 to 4 out of 5.

What are the infection rates at RIVERS HEALTH?

RIVERS HEALTH tracks 36 healthcare-associated infection measures. 0 are better than the national benchmark, 0 are worse, and 6 are at the national average.

Does RIVERS HEALTH have emergency services?

Yes, RIVERS HEALTH provides emergency services.

What type of hospital is RIVERS HEALTH?

RIVERS HEALTH is a Acute Care Hospitals facility with Voluntary non-profit - Private ownership, located in POINT PLEASANT, WV.

How much does Medicare spend at RIVERS HEALTH?

Medicare spending data is available for RIVERS HEALTH across 1 spending categories. These measures compare the hospital's spending per episode to the national median.

Does RIVERS HEALTH offer maternal health services?

Yes, RIVERS HEALTH reports maternal health data including 4 measures such as C-section rates and maternal morbidity outcomes.

Data Sources

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare. Last refreshed from CMS: .

Hospital quality data is sourced from the CMS Hospital Compare program, with patient-experience scores drawn from the HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey. Data includes overall star ratings, quality measures, healthcare-associated infections, unplanned visits, Medicare spending, and maternal health measures.

Source: CMS Hospital Compare. This information is not medical advice. Learn more

All federal data sources used on this page

Verify with CDC →