UCSF MEDICAL CENTER

5/5

505 PARNASSUS AVE, BOX 0296, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94143

SAN FRANCISCO County

UCSF MEDICAL CENTER is a Acute Care Hospitals located in SAN FRANCISCO, CA, with Voluntary non-profit - Other ownership, according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare program. CMS overall quality rating: 5 out of 5 stars, based on quality measures covering patient safety, patient experience (HCAHPS), readmission rates, and timeliness of care. Emergency services are available. This hospital performs better than the national average on 8 quality measures.

What the Data Shows About UCSF MEDICAL CENTER

UCSF MEDICAL CENTER is classified by CMS as a Acute Care Hospitals under Voluntary non-profit - Other ownership, serving SAN FRANCISCO, CA (SAN FRANCISCO County, ZIP 94143). Its overall CMS star rating is 5/5, a composite signal drawn from mortality outcomes, safety of care, readmission rates, patient experience (HCAHPS), and timely & effective care measures. Emergency services are available on site, and the facility carries the CMS Birthing-Friendly designation.

Across the quality-measure domains CMS tracks, UCSF MEDICAL CENTER posts 8 measures better than the national average and 1 measure worse, drawn from mortality (4 better / 0 worse), safety of care (3 better / 0 worse), and readmission (1 better / 1 worse). A total of 20 individual quality measures are reported for this facility, covering everything from sepsis care to surgical complications. The facility also reports 36 healthcare-associated infection measures under the CDC NHSN surveillance system.

Patient-experience data from the HCAHPS survey spans 68 domains at this hospital, including communication with doctors and nurses, staff responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge information — together these give a real-world read on how patients rate their stay. Medicare episode-of-care spending is tracked across 1 category, benchmarked against the national median. Maternal health reporting covers 4 measures, including C-section rates and maternal morbidity outcomes. All figures reflect the CMS Hospital Compare release from , and none of this page constitutes medical advice — always consult a clinician before choosing or changing care.

Type
Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership
Voluntary non-profit - Other
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
Phone: (415) 353-2733

Quality Measures

20

CMS-tracked

Patient Experience

68

HCAHPS domains

Infection Measures

36

CDC NHSN

CMS Overall Star Rating 100.0%

5 of 5 stars

Quality Summary

Mortality

Better than National4
Same as National3
Worse than National0

Safety of Care

Better than National3
Same as National5
Worse than National0

Readmission

Better than National1
Same as National9
Worse than National1

Quality Measures

Detailed quality measure performance compared to national benchmarks

Measure Score vs. National
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate 1.24 Same as National
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite 1.05 Same as National
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications 139.4 Better than National
Death rate for CABG surgery patients 2.1 Same as National
Death rate for COPD patients 7.5 Same as National
Death rate for heart attack patients 10.2 Same as National
Death rate for heart failure patients 6.7 Better than National
Death rate for pneumonia patients 10.6 Better than National
Death rate for stroke patients 11 Better than National
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate 2.9 Better than National
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate 0.22 Same as National
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate 0.2 Same as National
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate 4.9 Worse than National
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate 0.85 Same as National
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate 2 Same as National

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Patient satisfaction survey results measuring hospital care quality

Survey Question Star Rating
Cleanliness - linear mean score
Cleanliness - linear mean score
N/A
Cleanliness - star rating
Cleanliness - star rating
3
Communication about medicines - linear mean score
Communication about medicines - linear mean score
N/A
Communication about medicines - star rating
Communication about medicines - star rating
3
Discharge information - linear mean score
Discharge information - linear mean score
N/A
Discharge information - star rating
Discharge information - star rating
4
Doctor communication - linear mean score
Doctor communication - linear mean score
N/A
Doctor communication - star rating
Doctor communication - star rating
4
Nurse communication - linear mean score
Nurse communication - linear mean score
N/A
Nurse communication - star rating
Nurse communication - star rating
4
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
N/A
Overall hospital rating - star rating
Overall hospital rating - star rating
4
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)
Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low)
N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)
Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium)
N/A
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)
Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high)
N/A
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital
"NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it)
N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge
No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge
N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge
No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms
N/A
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home
No, staff "did not" give patients this information
N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them
Staff "always" explained
N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained
N/A
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them
Staff "usually" explained
N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night
"Always" quiet at night
N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night
"Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night
N/A
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night
"Usually" quiet at night
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well
Doctors "always" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand
Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them
Doctors "always" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect
Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well
Doctors "usually" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand
Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them
Doctors "usually" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well
Nurses "always" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand
Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them
Nurses "always" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect
Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well
Nurses "usually" communicated well
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand
Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand
N/A
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them
Nurses "usually" listened carefully
N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean
Room was "always" clean
N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean
Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean
N/A
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean
Room was "usually" clean
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for
Staff "always" explained new medications
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects
Staff "always" explained possible side effects
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.
Staff "usually" explained new medications
N/A
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects
Staff "usually" explained possible side effects
N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge
Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge
N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge
Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms
N/A
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home
Yes, staff "did" give patients this information
N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital
"YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital
N/A
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital
"YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital
N/A
Quietness - linear mean score
Quietness - linear mean score
N/A
Quietness - star rating
Quietness - star rating
2
Recommend hospital - linear mean score
Recommend hospital - linear mean score
N/A
Recommend hospital - star rating
Recommend hospital - star rating
5
Summary star rating
Summary star rating
4

Safety & Infections

Healthcare-associated infection rates compared to national benchmarks

Measure Score vs. National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) 0.75 Same as National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 0.525 Same as National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days 26681 Same as National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 33 Same as National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 44.022 Same as National
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 1.041 Same as National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) 0.56 Better than National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 0.394 Better than National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 34 Better than National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 60.699 Better than National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 0.774 Better than National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days 53447 Better than National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) 0.508 Better than National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit 0.392 Better than National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases 61 Better than National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days 257472 Better than National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases 120.169 Better than National
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit 0.648 Better than National
MRSA Bacteremia 0.364 Better than National
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit 0.178 Better than National
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases 9 Better than National
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days 281680 Better than National
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases 24.7 Better than National
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit 0.669 Better than National
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy 0.921 Same as National
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit 0.234 Same as National
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures 407 Same as National
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases 3 Same as National
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases 3.256 Same as National
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit 2.508 Same as National
SSI - Colon Surgery 0.923 Same as National
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit 0.513 Same as National
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures 536 Same as National
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases 13 Same as National
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases 14.088 Same as National
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit 1.538 Same as National

Staffing & Spending

Medicare spending per episode and unplanned visit measures

Unplanned Visits & Readmissions

Measure Score vs. National
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate 14.4 Same as National
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate 18.2 Same as National
Hospital return days for heart attack patients 40.3 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for heart failure patients -16.9 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients 30.3 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR) 14 Better than National
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate 16.4 Same as National
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy 5.7 Same as National
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy 12.8 Worse than National
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacement 4.5 Same as National
Rate of readmission for CABG 10.1 Same as National
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients 17.6 Same as National
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies) 13.9 Same as National
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery 0.8 Better than National

Medicare Spending

Measure Score
Medicare hospital spending per patient (Medicare Spending per Beneficiary) 0.96

Maternal Health

Maternal care quality measures including C-section rates and outcomes

Measure Score
Cesarean Birth N/A
Maternal Morbidity Structural Measure N/A
Risk Adjusted Severe Obstetric Complications (All) N/A
Risk Adjusted Severe Obstetric Complications (excluding blood-transfusion-only cases) N/A

Nearby Hospitals in California

Other Medicare-certified hospitals in California — tap any card for its full quality profile.

Compare UCSF MEDICAL CENTER vs 60th Medical Group (Travis AFB) →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the CMS star rating for UCSF MEDICAL CENTER?

UCSF MEDICAL CENTER has an overall CMS star rating of 5 out of 5. CMS star ratings are based on multiple quality measures including mortality, safety of care, readmission rates, patient experience, and timely and effective care.

How does UCSF MEDICAL CENTER perform on quality measures?

UCSF MEDICAL CENTER has 8 quality measures rated better than the national average and 1 rated worse. 20 total quality measures are tracked for this facility.

What do patients say about UCSF MEDICAL CENTER?

Patient experience at UCSF MEDICAL CENTER is measured through HCAHPS surveys covering 68 categories including communication with doctors, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness, and discharge information. Patient survey star ratings range from 2 to 5 out of 5.

What are the infection rates at UCSF MEDICAL CENTER?

UCSF MEDICAL CENTER tracks 36 healthcare-associated infection measures. 18 are better than the national benchmark, 0 are worse, and 18 are at the national average.

Does UCSF MEDICAL CENTER have emergency services?

Yes, UCSF MEDICAL CENTER provides emergency services.

What type of hospital is UCSF MEDICAL CENTER?

UCSF MEDICAL CENTER is a Acute Care Hospitals facility with Voluntary non-profit - Other ownership, located in SAN FRANCISCO, CA. This facility has received the CMS Birthing-Friendly designation.

How much does Medicare spend at UCSF MEDICAL CENTER?

Medicare spending data is available for UCSF MEDICAL CENTER across 1 spending categories. These measures compare the hospital's spending per episode to the national median.

Does UCSF MEDICAL CENTER offer maternal health services?

Yes, UCSF MEDICAL CENTER reports maternal health data including 4 measures such as C-section rates and maternal morbidity outcomes. This facility has been designated as Birthing-Friendly by CMS.

Data Sources

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare. Last refreshed from CMS: .

Hospital quality data is sourced from the CMS Hospital Compare program, with patient-experience scores drawn from the HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey. Data includes overall star ratings, quality measures, healthcare-associated infections, unplanned visits, Medicare spending, and maternal health measures.

Source: CMS Hospital Compare. This information is not medical advice. Learn more

All federal data sources used on this page

Verify with CDC →